Sunday, October 5, 2025
More

    Trump DOJ Files Motion to Unseal Epstein Grand Jury Testimonies

    AG Bondi follows Trump’s directive to make the Epstein grand jury testimony public.

    Summary:
    The Trump administration’s Department of Justice has filed an official motion to unseal grand jury transcripts tied to Jeffrey Epstein’s 2019 criminal indictment, citing the need for public transparency amid growing interest. The filing comes after President Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi publicly committed to releasing all relevant testimony.

    DOJ Cites Public Interest in Epstein Probe Transparency

    On July 18, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice, under the direction of Attorney General Pam Bondi, formally requested the Southern District of New York to unseal grand jury transcripts related to the federal case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (Docket No. 1:19-cr-490).

    The motion follows a DOJ-FBI memorandum issued on July 6, 2025, which detailed an exhaustive review of investigative materials regarding Epstein’s alleged co-conspirators. The memo concluded that “no evidence existed” to justify new charges against third parties.

    “Given the public interest in the investigative work conducted by the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation into Epstein, the Department of Justice moves the Court to unseal the underlying grand jury.” — DOJ Motion Filing

    Bondi’s Pledge Follows Trump’s Directive

    Attorney General Pam Bondi publicly confirmed her office’s intent via X (formerly Twitter), stating:

    “President Trump—we are ready to move the court tomorrow to unseal the grand jury transcripts.”

    Her statement followed a Truth Social post by President Donald Trump, in which he demanded transparency regarding the high-profile Epstein case:

    “Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval. This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now!”

    Transparency vs. Legal Constraints

    The motion emphasizes the administration’s commitment to transparency but does not imply any change in its July 6 position—that no charges are warranted against uncharged third parties. Still, the effort to unseal sealed records could reveal critical historical context surrounding the Epstein investigation.

    What Happens Next?

    The Southern District of New York must now decide whether releasing grand jury materials would violate legal statutes protecting secrecy in such proceedings. Legal analysts are divided, with some citing potential privacy breaches while others argue the public’s right to know outweighs prosecutorial privilege in this case.

    Follow Virginia Times for regular news updates. Stay informed with the latest headlines, breaking stories, and in-depth reporting from around the world.

    Comments
    More From Author

    A global media for the latest news, entertainment, music fashion, and more.

    - Advertisement -
    VT Newsroom
    VT Newsroom
    A global media for the latest news, entertainment, music fashion, and more.

    Latest news

    Related news

    Weekly News