In recent days, a few voices in Nepali-language media have criticized journalists who use Artificial Intelligence (AI) in their work. One such comment accused AI writers of “fabrication,” claiming their stories “belong in the trash bin.” The statement even challenged journalists to prove their worth by writing only in Nepali, calling English-language or AI-assisted reporting a “disgrace.”
Let’s be clear: these criticisms are not rooted in journalistic ethics—they’re rooted in misunderstanding, insecurity, and a refusal to adapt.
Virginia Times Stands by Its Standards
At Virginia Times, we use AI as a modern tool, just like professional newsrooms worldwide. We use it to research, cross-check facts, organize timelines, and assist in formatting—not to fabricate stories or replace human judgment. Every article we publish is reviewed and edited by professional journalists with a commitment to the truth.
What we do not do is copy, paste, or poorly translate English content and call it original reporting—unfortunately, that’s a common practice among some of our loudest critics.
Journalism Is About Integrity, Not Language
Real journalism isn’t defined by whether you write in English or Nepali. It’s defined by accuracy, verification, fairness, and transparency. We respect and celebrate those who write well in Nepali. But writing in one’s native language is not the only proof of integrity.
If someone publishes biased, unverified, or plagiarized content in any language, they are undermining journalism—not the people who responsibly use AI to improve their workflow.
Innovation Isn’t Cheating—It’s a Responsibility
Major newsrooms like The New York Times and The Washington Post are already using AI in responsible ways. Technology doesn’t destroy journalism—misuse and dishonesty do. Pretending that innovation equals deception only exposes one’s lack of understanding.
What truly disrespects journalism is calling translated content “original reporting” or making sensational claims without evidence.
What the Industry Is Saying About AI in Journalism
Artificial Intelligence is actively reshaping journalism, from editorial workflows to public trust. Below are three of the most widely respected articles from major publications that critically examine how AI is being integrated into modern newsrooms:
-
The Newspaper That Hired ChatGPT — The Atlantic
A behind-the-scenes look at Italy’s Il Foglio, which launched a month-long daily AI editorial insert generated using ChatGPT and reviewed by human editors. A transparent, real-world example of AI-human collaboration in journalism. -
Will A.I. Save the News? — The New Yorker
This essay explores whether AI will be a savior or threat to journalism. It emphasizes the enduring need for human oversight and fact-based integrity, even in tech-driven news environments. -
Rise of Super Journalists — Axios
Axios co-founder Jim VandeHei lays out a vision for a new era of “Super Journalists” who combine domain expertise with AI tools to produce faster, deeper, and more credible reporting.
Final Word
We at Virginia Times will continue to use every available tool to serve our readers with timely, accurate, and responsible journalism. Whether it’s English or Nepali, typed or AI-assisted, our commitment is to truth—not performance.
We don’t fear innovation. We fear a journalism landscape where shortcuts, jealousy, and misinformation become the loudest voices. And we will always stand against that.
Follow Virginia Times for regular news updates. Stay informed with the latest headlines, breaking stories, and in-depth reporting from around the world.
A global media for the latest news, entertainment, music fashion, and more.
